Highlights the Power of Spousal Testimonial Privilege As Seen Through Possible John Edwards Marriage

There is a report that embattled previous senator and governmental contender John Edwards is going to marry his one-time girlfriend, Rielle Seeker. Edwards is accused of conspiring to breach project finance laws by using approximately $ 1 million from project contributors to cover up his affair and the child he fathered with Rielle Hunter. If Edwards does wed Seeker, she would not be required to testify against him at the trial if she did not desire to, and some theorists think this is the only reason he wishes to wed Ms. Seeker. This is because of the testimonial privilege in between partners. If this matter were a separation, nevertheless, the privilege against partners testifying against each other would not apply.

The spousal testimonial advantage can be a very powerful bar to testimony. The benefit has 2 parts. There is a privilege not to testify against one’s spouse and a privilege not to be called as a witness against one’s spouse. A wedded individual has an advantage not to testify against his/her spouse in any proceeding. Furthermore, a married individual whose spouse is a party to the case has a privilege not to be called as a witness by an adverse party without the previous express consent of the spouse having the benefit.

The spousal testimonial benefit does not apply in separation cases. Spouses are commonly at odds  concerning the means child custody and visitation should be decided or exactly how assets

ought to be divided. Anything a spouse says can be made use of against them in Court when disputing these issues. One spouse confessing to concealing assets in a Swiss checking account, for instance, can not claim an advantage against having his wife indicate against him when she wishes to be compensated for losing access to the cash. Individuals are wise not to state anything around their partners that could later on open the door to an undesirable court action.

There are numerous methods that a partner can interact with their other half– in person, on the phone, e-mail, text messages, etc. During the family law litigation process, all

of these kinds of interaction and even more can be discovered and used as evidence at trial. Either partner could get on the stand and state word for word exactly what her partner informed her through any type of type of communication. The other partner is powerless to keep her quiet.

Comments are closed.